Love Fuel?    Donate

FuelPHP Forums

Ask your question about FuelPHP in the appropriate forum, or help others by answering their questions.
Some wrid funtionallity on Validator
  • Hi I really likes this framework. I'm using it on some personal applications. Trying the Validator I found some rare behavior when I use it like this: $validator = Validation::forge('validator');
    $validator->add('username', 'Username')
    ->add_rule('required')
    ->add_rule('min_length', 3)
    ->add_rule('max_length', 12)
    ->add_rule('valid_string', 'alpha');
    $validator->add('c_password', 'Confirm password')
    ->add_rule('required');
    $validator->add('password', 'Password')
    ->add_rule('required')
    ->add_rule('min_length', 3)
    ->add_rule('max_length', 20)
    ->add_rule('match_field', 'c_password');
    $validator->add('email', 'Email')
    ->add_rule('required')
    ->add_rule('valid_email')
    ->add_rule('match_field', 'c_email');
    $validator->add('c_email', 'Confirm email')
    ->add_rule('required'); if ($validator->run(array('username'=>$username, 'email'=>$email, 'c_password'=>$c_password, 'password'=>$password))){
    }
    If password and c_password not match I get this error: The field Password must match the field c_password. I think the error must have the field label instead the field name. I fix it manually going into: core/lang/en/validation.php and change: ...
    'match_field' => 'The field :label must match the field :param:1.',
    ... for this: ...
    'match_field' => 'The field :label must match the field :param:2.',
    ... then on my validator rule add a second parameter: ...->add_rule('match_field', 'c_password', 'Confirm password'); That solve the problem, but I think is a temporary solution.
    Hope the core team can fix it for the next release. Keep FuelPhp burning... Odiel
  • Can you create an issue for this on http://github.com/fuel/core/issues so it won't be forgotten?

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion