Although I haven't tried out the core for Fuel 2.0. There is another framework that I really like called Lithium. The only thing I don't like is the community doesn't even really exist and I don't see any activity on GitHub.
I'm not looking for complete answers or a comparison of which framework is the best, etc.... Just some feedback from people who have used it. I wanted to use it along with Fuel because it has a super nice routing module.
Regards,
Matt
Fuel ready to be played with?
You mean 2.0?
To play with, yes absolutely. To use for major applications, probably not. Unless you find third party libaries for the bits that are still missing (which is most of the supporting core classes, as we focused on getting the kernel ready first).
With the invent of all the micro-frameworks and using bundles via Composer. We have the flexibility to choose just about every aspect of our own custom framework. The kernel, auth packages, ORM, etc.... I think the days of paradigms are coming to an end.
It's the main reason 2.0 is setup like that.
Run the Fuel kernel, plug in any Composer package you want. The current core functionality (like session, cache, etc) are going to be separate Composer packages too. Want to use a different session solution, no problem, load that Composer package instead...
It is how the kernel is tested in the field, Jelmer has al his applications already running in production on 2.0, using a few Composer packages to fill in bits still missing in your core.
It's the main reason 2.0 is setup like that.
Run the Fuel kernel, plug in any Composer package you want. The current core functionality (like session, cache, etc) are going to be separate Composer packages too. Want to use a different session solution, no problem, load that Composer package instead...
It is how the kernel is tested in the field, Jelmer has al his applications already running in production on 2.0, using a few Composer packages to fill in bits still missing in our core.
Donate
